ModelRefs / Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B — Benchmarks, Pricing &…

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B — Benchmarks, Pricing &…

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.

Overview

Context window: Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts up to 200,000 tokens, Qwen2.5-VL 72B up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B at a glance

AttributeClaude 3.5 HaikuQwen2.5-VL 72B
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba
Released2024-11-042025-01-26
Context window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Input price$0.8/M tokensFree / self-hosted
Output price$4/M tokensFree / self-hosted
LicenceProprietaryQwen
Self-hostableNo, hosted onlyYes, open weights
Modalitiestexttext, vision

Where they differ most

  • Cost Efficiency: Claude 3.5 Haiku 65%, Qwen2.5-VL 72B 100%. Qwen2.5-VL 72B leads on this dimension.
  • Reasoning: Claude 3.5 Haiku 42%, Qwen2.5-VL 72B 75%. Qwen2.5-VL 72B leads on this dimension.

Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.

Continue your research

Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B — Benchmarks, Pricing &….

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Qwen2.5-VL 72B?

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen2.5-VL 72B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than Qwen2.5-VL 72B?

Compare $0.00080 vs $0.00000 on this page.