ModelRefs / GPT-4.1 Mini vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet — Benchmarks, Pricing & C…

GPT-4.1 Mini vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet — Benchmarks, Pricing & C…

GPT-4.1 Mini vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.

Overview

Context window: Claude 3.7 Sonnet accepts up to 200,000 tokens, GPT-4.1 Mini up to 1,000,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-4.1 Mini at a glance

AttributeClaude 3.7 SonnetGPT-4.1 Mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Released2025-02-242025-04-14
Context window200,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Input price$3/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$15/M tokens$1.6/M tokens
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Self-hostableNo, hosted onlyNo, hosted only
Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision

Where they differ most

  • Cost Efficiency: Claude 3.7 Sonnet 37%, GPT-4.1 Mini 80%. GPT-4.1 Mini leads on this dimension.

Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.

Continue your research

Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to GPT-4.1 Mini vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet — Benchmarks, Pricing & C….

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, GPT-4.1 Mini or Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

GPT-4.1 Mini and Claude 3.7 Sonnet target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.

Is GPT-4.1 Mini cheaper than Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

Compare $0.00040 vs $0.00300 on this page.