ModelRefs / Mistral Small 3.1 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet — Benchmarks, Pricin…
Mistral Small 3.1 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet — Benchmarks, Pricin…
Mistral Small 3.1 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Context window: Claude 3.7 Sonnet accepts up to 200,000 tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Mistral Small 3.1 at a glance
| Attribute | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | 2025-03-17 |
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input price | $3/M tokens | $0.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $15/M tokens | $0.3/M tokens |
| Licence | Proprietary | Apache-2.0 |
| Self-hostable | No, hosted only | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
Where they differ most
- Cost Efficiency: Claude 3.7 Sonnet 37%, Mistral Small 3.1 95%. Mistral Small 3.1 leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Mistral Small 3.1 vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet — Benchmarks, Pricin….
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Mistral Small 3.1 or Claude 3.7 Sonnet?
Mistral Small 3.1 and Claude 3.7 Sonnet target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Mistral Small 3.1 cheaper than Claude 3.7 Sonnet?
Compare $0.00010 vs $0.00300 on this page.