ModelRefs / Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3 27B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding…

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3 27B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding…

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3 27B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.

Overview

Context window: Claude 3 Opus accepts up to 200,000 tokens, Gemma 3 27B up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3 27B at a glance

AttributeClaude 3 OpusGemma 3 27B
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Released2024-02-292025-02-01
Context window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Input price$15/M tokens$0.1/M tokens
Output price$75/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
LicenceProprietaryGemma
Self-hostableNo, hosted onlyYes, open weights
Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision

Where they differ most

  • Reasoning: Claude 3 Opus 50%, Gemma 3 27B 82%. Gemma 3 27B leads on this dimension.

Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.

Continue your research

Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3 27B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding….

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Gemma 3 27B?

Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3 27B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.

Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than Gemma 3 27B?

Compare $0.0150 vs $0.00010 on this page.