ModelRefs / Claude 3 Opus vs Mistral Small 3.1 — Benchmarks, Pricing &…

Claude 3 Opus vs Mistral Small 3.1 — Benchmarks, Pricing &…

Claude 3 Opus vs Mistral Small 3.1: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.

Overview

Context window: Claude 3 Opus accepts up to 200,000 tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.

Claude 3 Opus vs Mistral Small 3.1 at a glance

AttributeClaude 3 OpusMistral Small 3.1
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Released2024-02-292025-03-17
Context window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Input price$15/M tokens$0.1/M tokens
Output price$75/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
LicenceProprietaryApache-2.0
Self-hostableNo, hosted onlyYes, open weights
Modalitiestext, visiontext, vision

Where they differ most

  • Reasoning: Claude 3 Opus 50%, Mistral Small 3.1 67%. Mistral Small 3.1 leads on this dimension.

Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.

Continue your research

Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Claude 3 Opus vs Mistral Small 3.1 — Benchmarks, Pricing &….

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Mistral Small 3.1?

Claude 3 Opus and Mistral Small 3.1 target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.

Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than Mistral Small 3.1?

Compare $0.0150 vs $0.00010 on this page.