ModelRefs / Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 4 — Benchmarks, Pricing & Codi…
Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 4 — Benchmarks, Pricing & Codi…
Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 4: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Claude Opus 4: Claude Opus 4 is Anthropic's May 2025 hybrid-reasoning model for complex coding, reasoning, multimodal analysis, and long-running agent workflows. The dated claude-opus-4-20250514 snapshot was retired on Anthropic-operated platforms on June 15, 2026 and is retained as a historical evaluation and migration reference.
Llama 4 Scout: Llama 4 Scout is Meta's efficiency-focused open-weights model with an exceptionally large 10M-token context window and vision support. It is optimized for long-document retrieval and low-cost inference at scale.
Context window: Claude Opus 4 accepts up to 200,000 tokens, Llama 4 Scout up to 10,000,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
Claude Opus 4 vs Llama 4 Scout at a glance
| Attribute | Claude Opus 4 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Released | 2025-05-22 | 2025-04-01 |
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 10,000,000 tokens |
| Input price | $15/M tokens | $0.11/M tokens |
| Output price | $75/M tokens | $0.34/M tokens |
| Licence | Proprietary | Llama 4 Community |
| Self-hostable | No, hosted only | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
Benchmarks reported for both
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Llama 4 Scout | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| gpqa | 79.6 | 57.2 | 2025-05-22 / 2025-04-01 |
| mmmu | 76.5 | 73.4 | 2025-05-22 / 2025-04-01 |
Scores are as published by their cited sources on the dates shown. Different runs use different harnesses, prompts, and dates, so treat these as directional evidence rather than a head-to-head result.
Where they differ most
- Coding: Claude Opus 4 60%, Llama 4 Scout 33%. Claude Opus 4 leads on this dimension.
- OCR: Claude Opus 4 77%, Llama 4 Scout 89%. Llama 4 Scout leads on this dimension.
- Reasoning: Claude Opus 4 78%, Llama 4 Scout 67%. Claude Opus 4 leads on this dimension.
- Multimodal: Claude Opus 4 77%, Llama 4 Scout 76%. Claude Opus 4 leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 4 — Benchmarks, Pricing & Codi….
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Claude Opus 4?
Llama 4 Scout and Claude Opus 4 target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than Claude Opus 4?
Compare $0.00011 vs $0.0150 on this page.