ModelRefs / Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Sonnet 4 — Benchmarks, Pricing & Co…
Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Sonnet 4 — Benchmarks, Pricing & Co…
Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Sonnet 4: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Claude Sonnet 4: Claude Sonnet 4 is Anthropic's May 2025 hybrid-reasoning model for coding, visual reasoning, tool use, and agent workflows. The dated claude-sonnet-4-20250514 snapshot was retired on Anthropic-operated platforms on June 15, 2026 and is retained as a historical evaluation and migration reference.
Llama 4 Scout: Llama 4 Scout is Meta's efficiency-focused open-weights model with an exceptionally large 10M-token context window and vision support. It is optimized for long-document retrieval and low-cost inference at scale.
Context window: Claude Sonnet 4 accepts up to 200,000 tokens, Llama 4 Scout up to 10,000,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Llama 4 Scout at a glance
| Attribute | Claude Sonnet 4 | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Released | 2025-05-22 | 2025-04-01 |
| Context window | 200,000 tokens | 10,000,000 tokens |
| Input price | $3/M tokens | $0.11/M tokens |
| Output price | $15/M tokens | $0.34/M tokens |
| Licence | Proprietary | Llama 4 Community |
| Self-hostable | No, hosted only | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
Benchmarks reported for both
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | Llama 4 Scout | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| gpqa | 75.4 | 57.2 | 2025-05-22 / 2025-04-01 |
| mmmu | 74.4 | 73.4 | 2025-05-22 / 2025-04-01 |
Scores are as published by their cited sources on the dates shown. Different runs use different harnesses, prompts, and dates, so treat these as directional evidence rather than a head-to-head result.
Where they differ most
- Cost Efficiency: Claude Sonnet 4 37%, Llama 4 Scout 94%. Llama 4 Scout leads on this dimension.
- Coding: Claude Sonnet 4 57%, Llama 4 Scout 33%. Claude Sonnet 4 leads on this dimension.
- OCR: Claude Sonnet 4 74%, Llama 4 Scout 89%. Llama 4 Scout leads on this dimension.
- Reasoning: Claude Sonnet 4 73%, Llama 4 Scout 67%. Claude Sonnet 4 leads on this dimension.
- Multimodal: Claude Sonnet 4 74%, Llama 4 Scout 76%. Llama 4 Scout leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Llama 4 Scout vs Claude Sonnet 4 — Benchmarks, Pricing & Co….
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Claude Sonnet 4?
Llama 4 Scout and Claude Sonnet 4 target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4?
Compare $0.00011 vs $0.00300 on this page.