ModelRefs / Gemma 3 27B vs DeepSeek V3 — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding C…
Gemma 3 27B vs DeepSeek V3 — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding C…
Gemma 3 27B vs DeepSeek V3: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Context window: DeepSeek V3 accepts up to 128,000 tokens, Gemma 3 27B up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
DeepSeek V3 vs Gemma 3 27B at a glance
| Attribute | DeepSeek V3 | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Released | 2024-12-26 | 2025-02-01 |
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input price | $0.27/M tokens | $0.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.1/M tokens | $0.3/M tokens |
| Licence | MIT | Gemma |
| Self-hostable | Yes, open weights | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text | text, vision |
Where they differ most
- Cost Efficiency: DeepSeek V3 85%, Gemma 3 27B 95%. Gemma 3 27B leads on this dimension.
- Reasoning: DeepSeek V3 76%, Gemma 3 27B 82%. Gemma 3 27B leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Gemma 3 27B vs DeepSeek V3 — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding C….
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or DeepSeek V3?
Gemma 3 27B and DeepSeek V3 target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Gemma 3 27B cheaper than DeepSeek V3?
Compare $0.00010 vs $0.00027 on this page.