ModelRefs / Mistral Small 3.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash — Benchmarks, Pricing…

Mistral Small 3.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash — Benchmarks, Pricing…

Mistral Small 3.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.

Overview

Context window: Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts up to 1,000,000 tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Mistral Small 3.1 at a glance

AttributeGemini 2.5 FlashMistral Small 3.1
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Released2025-03-012025-03-17
Context window1,000,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Input price$0.075/M tokens$0.1/M tokens
Output price$0.3/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
LicenceProprietaryApache-2.0
Self-hostableNo, hosted onlyYes, open weights
Modalitiestext, vision, audiotext, vision

Where they differ most

  • Reasoning: Gemini 2.5 Flash 83%, Mistral Small 3.1 67%. Gemini 2.5 Flash leads on this dimension.
  • Cost Efficiency: Gemini 2.5 Flash 95%, Mistral Small 3.1 95%. Gemini 2.5 Flash leads on this dimension.

Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.

Continue your research

Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Mistral Small 3.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash — Benchmarks, Pricing….

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Mistral Small 3.1 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Mistral Small 3.1 and Gemini 2.5 Flash target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.

Is Mistral Small 3.1 cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Compare $0.00010 vs $0.00007 on this page.