ModelRefs / Mistral Small 3.1 vs Gemma 3 27B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Co…
Mistral Small 3.1 vs Gemma 3 27B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Co…
Mistral Small 3.1 vs Gemma 3 27B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Context window: Gemma 3 27B accepts up to 128,000 tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
Gemma 3 27B vs Mistral Small 3.1 at a glance
| Attribute | Gemma 3 27B | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Released | 2025-02-01 | 2025-03-17 |
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input price | $0.1/M tokens | $0.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.3/M tokens | $0.3/M tokens |
| Licence | Gemma | Apache-2.0 |
| Self-hostable | Yes, open weights | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
Where they differ most
- Reasoning: Gemma 3 27B 82%, Mistral Small 3.1 67%. Gemma 3 27B leads on this dimension.
- Cost Efficiency: Gemma 3 27B 95%, Mistral Small 3.1 95%. Both score the same on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Mistral Small 3.1 vs Gemma 3 27B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Co….
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Mistral Small 3.1 or Gemma 3 27B?
Mistral Small 3.1 and Gemma 3 27B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Mistral Small 3.1 cheaper than Gemma 3 27B?
Compare $0.00010 vs $0.00010 on this page.