ModelRefs / Text Embedding 3 Large vs GPT-4o — Benchmarks, Pricing & Co…
Text Embedding 3 Large vs GPT-4o — Benchmarks, Pricing & Co…
Text Embedding 3 Large vs GPT-4o: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Context window: GPT-4o accepts up to 128,000 tokens, Text Embedding 3 Large up to 8,191. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
GPT-4o vs Text Embedding 3 Large at a glance
| Attribute | GPT-4o | Text Embedding 3 Large |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Released | 2024-05-13 | 2024-01-25 |
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 8,191 tokens |
| Input price | $2.5/M tokens | $0.13/M tokens |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | Free / self-hosted |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Self-hostable | No, hosted only | No, hosted only |
| Modalities | text, vision, audio | text, Embedding |
Where they differ most
- Cost Efficiency: GPT-4o 46%, Text Embedding 3 Large 99%. Text Embedding 3 Large leads on this dimension.
- Multilingual: GPT-4o 90%, Text Embedding 3 Large 78%. GPT-4o leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Text Embedding 3 Large vs GPT-4o — Benchmarks, Pricing & Co….
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Text Embedding 3 Large or GPT-4o?
Text Embedding 3 Large and GPT-4o target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Text Embedding 3 Large cheaper than GPT-4o?
Compare $0.00013 vs $0.00250 on this page.