ModelRefs / Mistral Small 3.1 vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing…
Mistral Small 3.1 vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing…
Mistral Small 3.1 vs InternVL2.5 78B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Context window: InternVL2.5 78B accepts up to 32,768 tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 up to 128,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
InternVL2.5 78B vs Mistral Small 3.1 at a glance
| Attribute | InternVL2.5 78B | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenGVLab | Mistral AI |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2025-03-17 |
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Input price | Free / self-hosted | $0.1/M tokens |
| Output price | Free / self-hosted | $0.3/M tokens |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Self-hostable | Yes, open weights | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
Where they differ most
- Cost Efficiency: InternVL2.5 78B 100%, Mistral Small 3.1 95%. InternVL2.5 78B leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Mistral Small 3.1 vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing….
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Mistral Small 3.1 or InternVL2.5 78B?
Mistral Small 3.1 and InternVL2.5 78B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Mistral Small 3.1 cheaper than InternVL2.5 78B?
Compare $0.00010 vs $0.00000 on this page.