ModelRefs / o3 vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding Compar…
o3 vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding Compar…
o3 vs InternVL2.5 78B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
o3: o3 is OpenAI's extended-thinking reasoning model, applying deliberate chain-of-thought computation to excel on mathematics, science, and competitive programming tasks. Released in April 2025, it introduced OpenAI's scalable test-time compute approach at production scale.
Context window: InternVL2.5 78B accepts up to 32,768 tokens, o3 up to 200,000. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
InternVL2.5 78B vs o3 at a glance
| Attribute | InternVL2.5 78B | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenGVLab | OpenAI |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2025-04-01 |
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 200,000 tokens |
| Input price | Free / self-hosted | $10/M tokens |
| Output price | Free / self-hosted | $40/M tokens |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary |
| Self-hostable | Yes, open weights | No, hosted only |
| Modalities | text, vision | text, vision |
Where they differ most
- Cost Efficiency: InternVL2.5 78B 100%, o3 13%. InternVL2.5 78B leads on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to o3 vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding Compar….
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, o3 or InternVL2.5 78B?
o3 and InternVL2.5 78B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is o3 cheaper than InternVL2.5 78B?
Compare $0.0100 vs $0.00000 on this page.