ModelRefs / Phi-4 vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding Com…
Phi-4 vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding Com…
Phi-4 vs InternVL2.5 78B: side-by-side benchmarks, pricing, context windows, coding ability and deployment. Pick the right model for your stack.
Overview
Phi-4: Microsoft's 14B dense decoder-only open-weight text model, trained on 9.8T tokens with a synthetic-data-centered curriculum and available through the microsoft/phi-4 artifact and Microsoft Foundry.
Context window: InternVL2.5 78B accepts up to 32,768 tokens, Phi-4 up to 16,384. Confirm the limit for your specific deployment channel before relying on it.
InternVL2.5 78B vs Phi-4 at a glance
| Attribute | InternVL2.5 78B | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenGVLab | Microsoft |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2024-12-12 |
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Input price | Free / self-hosted | Free / self-hosted |
| Output price | Free / self-hosted | Free / self-hosted |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Self-hostable | Yes, open weights | Yes, open weights |
| Modalities | text, vision | text |
Where they differ most
- Cost Efficiency: InternVL2.5 78B 100%, Phi-4 100%. Both score the same on this dimension.
Capability scores are ModelRefs' own derived signals, not vendor claims or benchmark results. Validate against your own workload before relying on them.
Continue your research
Use these connected ModelRefs sections to compare alternatives, inspect implementation paths, and review the evidence and governance boundaries relevant to Phi-4 vs InternVL2.5 78B — Benchmarks, Pricing & Coding Com….
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Phi-4 or InternVL2.5 78B?
Phi-4 and InternVL2.5 78B target different workloads — see the benchmark and pricing tables for a side-by-side answer.
Is Phi-4 cheaper than InternVL2.5 78B?
Compare $0.00000 vs $0.00000 on this page.